151
General / Re: Achievements
« on: July 30, 2012, 03:11:03 pm »
i agree with it... with one condition to me 

| You are Here: |
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


In the 1st case it's even easier. Cities are usually grew too. Lot's of resources, fast trains = easy game.I don't want easy games for some when others had lots of work... "Points system" was the original subject and since that's directly connected to server balance, Batt, what's your suggestion(s)?
geez, ST2, u think too much(answer to the challenge)
(re-answer to the challenge)
Myhorta is right. Btw St2, i don`t agree with Found_Town=0 because if you start the game in 2000 (after 40 years) the number of industries dramatically decreased so basically you need to fund industries and you can`t start searching all over the map on where are the places where industries dissapeared so you can fund a new.It`s simpler to fund a town and then fund an industry even if...it`s quite expensive. However, i would agree with Town Growth Rate decrease.Only to clear out my opinion/suggestions:
As for Geert`s complaint, i would advise him to record his data more accurate (no of trains, duration of game, duration of his company.......) and the answers will come themselves
)




in my last game I didnt fund any towns so I ''used'' the mapI still have to disagree on this:
the town you see there was only really small when i started my stations there so thats not the point
and with the system i use I dont ''own'' more then 50% of a town like the rules state
If i build 2 stations like that on any other city without using tunnels like other people do!! would that be better?

eh, i just love them allI don't know how's in Germany... but here poligamy is not well accepted ^^
...: Server 6 (Hard Goal) \o/
)
) and as a way to relax a bit.