Messages

61

Suggestions / Re: Change of rule 4 (partly "the 50% rule")

« on: May 20, 2013, 06:16:48 pm »

Indeed there are usually enough ways to build a station so that there is room for competition. Also 2 sides is a good rule of thumb. The problem however usually does not arise around primary industries, but around towns, where people build roads to grow them or a lot of stations and at secondary industries where dozens of trains drop off and take cargo. And that is where the hard part is to judge is some cases.

62

General Chat / Re: My favorite n-ice admin is...

« on: May 20, 2013, 05:51:06 pm »

I would vote for geo,but send me at least several of your nude arts

I'm beginning to understand why so few girls play online games...

63

General Chat / Re: My favorite n-ice admin is...

« on: May 20, 2013, 12:43:54 pm »

i haven't updated this poor thing in a while, so it was normal that i haven't added the others.
sorry for this

No problem I did

64

General Chat / Re: My favorite n-ice admin is...

« on: May 20, 2013, 09:23:39 am »

Well since you are resurrecting dead topics, might just as start it over 

Ah me and Taroon are left out..   

There you go

65

Suggestions / Re: [Poll] Competition on secondary industries

« on: May 19, 2013, 04:36:46 pm »

Alternative is to make the lumber mill as expensive as primary industries (if possible)
[/quote]

It sure is possible, but that can't be done with a Game script, it needs a newgrf. And to put a newgrf on all servers is probably not a good idea, since some players don't like it...

66

Suggestions / Re: [Poll] Competition on secondary industries

« on: May 19, 2013, 03:12:07 pm »

I agree the lumber mills could be a bit of a problem.
For other industries I don't think the effect is that bad. Primary industries are quite expensive, so take a long time to pay back. Factories and such are not that big of an advantage. Yes I agree the point of competition is slowing the other player down for some part. Maybe it is worth to exclude the lumber mill (if the private suggestion is implemented) But such details can always be discussed at the end of the poll

67

General Chat / Re: ban request list

« on: May 18, 2013, 11:45:32 am »

Ah finally someones sees my true motives! ty for the recognition Imus! Finally someone sees my true motives!

Ps (edit)

I'll have you know I am in favor of total competition. ( I also agree that leeching wood is a bit, well annoying... Also I am not for private industries (personally) But hey, as you noted yourself, you can then at least see what people will go mad if you compete with them.

68

General Chat / Re: ban request list

« on: May 18, 2013, 10:00:06 am »

.

69

General Chat / Re: ban request list

« on: May 18, 2013, 09:07:37 am »

Now I feel left out... Why didn't I make it to the list of terror? 

70

Complaints / Re: Rule # 12

« on: May 18, 2013, 09:03:45 am »

Is it in good taste building station with airport like that ?

My short opinion, no. Will I act on it? probably not, cause most other 'moderators'    seem to think it is ok.

71

Suggestions / Re: 18500 goals reached

« on: May 17, 2013, 08:40:18 pm »

(I dont want any credits for that )

Seems like somebody has been reading through the whole forum judging from this reference 

On topic:
Sounds like fun. Maybe some special 'award' on the profile would be nice as well. (points disappear after time anyway)

72

Suggestions / Re: [Poll] Competition on secondary industries

« on: May 17, 2013, 07:09:14 pm »

man, at least read before you reply...

Details about how much industries can be private and if this will be done using a protected area or simply by placing a sign indicating the ownership and other details can be discussed if the outcome of the poll requires it. 

And I can change it to no competition on secondary and I can tell you the outcome: the rule will stay the same. Also secondary industries are relatively cheap, so I think this will help players that don't like competition at all as well.

73

Introduction / Re: Hello @ll

« on: May 17, 2013, 06:50:28 pm »

am i know u ? 

Depends, are you some?

74

Suggestions / Re: [IMPLEMENTED] Setting changes for k8 (AirPlane Fantasia)

« on: May 17, 2013, 06:48:23 pm »

c'mon, don't pretend I said that I don't want to have anything changed. What I already said:

My suggestion to make the points fair when compared to the amount of work done for the same points on other servers:
Go back to the old settings and drastically reduce the amount of points given/game.

Besides do you think it is jun if you just build the airports, build the planes, and then wait? no thinking/transferring/strategy needed for a good game?

75

Suggestions / Re: [IMPLEMENTED] Setting changes for k8 (AirPlane Fantasia)

« on: May 17, 2013, 04:40:36 pm »

Personally I do not like to turn crashes off. It is part of the risk you take when playing with aircraft, and compensation for the fact that it is much less work than other transport.

Also I like a bit of strategy so I don't like being able to build large aircraft on small airports without consequences.